Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946118AbaD3V2S (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:28:18 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:11581 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753734AbaD3V2R (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:28:17 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,960,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="532698907" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rwsem: Support optimistic spinning From: Tim Chen To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Andrea Arcangeli , Alex Shi , Andi Kleen , Michel Lespinasse , Rik van Riel , Peter Hurley , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E.McKenney" , Aswin Chandramouleeswaran , "Norton, Scott J" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1398891992.10827.2.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <1398205166.6345.7.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <1398722941.25549.16.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140430082715.GA11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1398880209.2970.100.camel@schen9-DESK> <20140430180441.GF17778@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1398881337.2970.103.camel@schen9-DESK> <1398891699.2970.110.camel@schen9-DESK> <1398891992.10827.2.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:28:05 -0700 Message-ID: <1398893285.2970.111.camel@schen9-DESK> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 14:06 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > > > > > > > > > if (count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) > > > > > old = cmpxchg(&sem->count, count, count + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS); > > > > > else > > > > > old = cmpxchg(&sem->count, count, count + RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS); > > > > > > > > I think I simply mis-typed it; shouldn't both cases be > > > > RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS ? > > > > > > Yeah, we should just write it as > > > old = cmpxchg(&sem->count, count, RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS); > > > > Oops, I mean > > old = cmpxchg(&sem->count, count, count + RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS); > > > > for count == 0, we need sem->count to be RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS, > > for count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, we need sem->count to be RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS > > Yep, I had just noticed this. Peter's original suggestion was correct, > just needed to change RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS for RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS. > Yes, I think we are all on the same page now. Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/