Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965142AbaD3VdD (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:33:03 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:50501 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964975AbaD3VdB (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:33:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:32:59 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Rik van Riel Cc: Michal Hocko , Masayoshi Mizuma , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, sandeen@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com, mpatlasov@parallels.com, Motohiro.Kosaki@us.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm,writeback: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom Message-Id: <20140430143259.022534b79b01c5234df79dc7@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20140430164255.7a753a8e@cuia.bos.redhat.com> References: <20140429151910.53f740ef@annuminas.surriel.com> <5360C9E7.6010701@jp.fujitsu.com> <20140430093035.7e7226f2@annuminas.surriel.com> <20140430134826.GH4357@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20140430104114.4bdc588e@cuia.bos.redhat.com> <20140430120001.b4b95061ac7252a976b8a179@linux-foundation.org> <53614F3C.8020009@redhat.com> <20140430123526.bc6a229c1ea4addad1fb483d@linux-foundation.org> <20140430160218.442863e0@cuia.bos.redhat.com> <20140430131353.fa9f49604ea39425bc93c24a@linux-foundation.org> <20140430164255.7a753a8e@cuia.bos.redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:42:55 -0400 Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:13:53 -0700 > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > This was a consequence of 64->32 truncation and it can't happen any > > more, can it? > > Andrew, this is cleaner indeed :) > > Masayoshi-san, does the bug still happen with this version, or does > this fix the problem? I assumed we wanted a reported-by in there. > Subject: mm,writeback: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom > > It is possible for "limit - setpoint + 1" to equal zero, after > getting truncated to a 32 bit variable, and resulting in a divide > by zero error. > > Using the fully 64 bit divide functions avoids this problem. This isn't the whole story, is it? I added stuff: : Using the fully 64 bit divide functions avoids this problem. It also will : cause pos_ratio_polynom() to return the correct value when (setpoint - : limit) exceeds 2^32. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/