Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:25:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:25:54 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:6830 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:25:54 -0500 Subject: Re: [lkcd-general] Re: [lkcd-devel] Re: What's left over. From: Alan Cox To: Richard J Moore Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Andy Pfiffer , Mike Galbraith , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List , lkcd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, lkcd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, lkcd-general-admin@lists.sourceforge.net, mjbligh@us.ibm.com, "Randy.Dunlap" , Rusty Russell , suparna@linux.ibm.com, Linus Torvalds , Werner Almesberger , "Matt D. Robinson" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 15 Nov 2002 14:57:26 +0000 Message-Id: <1037372246.20050.13.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 745 Lines: 18 On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 09:38, Richard J Moore wrote: > > > > It would take a special hook that ran after the notifiers, and > > device_shutdown. At least in the normal case running what shutdown > > code we can is fairly important. And hooking the notifier lists > > would not give a guarantee of going last. > > Kernel Hooks would help here - that has a priority mechanism. I'd rather have a set of clearly defined notifiers so that I don't have to know about priority, just when I want to act - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/