Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752632AbaFAPqy (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:46:54 -0400 Received: from 78-32-181-23.static.enta.net ([78.32.181.23]:48373 "EHLO mail.linicks.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752250AbaFAPqx (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:46:53 -0400 Message-ID: <538B4AEC.7010108@linicks.net> Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 16:46:52 +0100 From: Nick Warne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 3.14.5 References: <538B16C8.8090900@linicks.net> In-Reply-To: <538B16C8.8090900@linicks.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/06/14 13:04, Nick Warne wrote: > I am getting hundreds of the same build warnings on this release - > usually I get none - typical warnings: > > include/linux/sched.h:1691: warning: ?pid_alive? declared inline after > being called > include/linux/sched.h:1691: warning: previous declaration of ?pid_alive? > was here > > Info: > > Machine AMD64 > gcc version 4.2.4 > > Any more info required please CC me. OK, revisiting this between decorating, changing line 1691 in include/linux/sched.h to reflect 'inline': from: static int pid_alive(const struct task_struct *p); to: static inline int pid_alive(const struct task_struct *p); stops GCC yelling at me. Nick -- "A bug in the code is worth two in the documentation." FSF Associate Member 5508 http://linicks.net/ http://pi.linicks.net/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/