Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:03:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:03:14 -0500 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:25860 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:03:13 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:09:25 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsuspend and CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM=y Message-ID: <20021115180924.GA8763@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20021115081044.GI18180@conectiva.com.br> <20021115084915.GS23425@holomorphy.com> <20021115094827.GT23425@holomorphy.com> <20021115120233.GC25902@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20021115120920.GV23425@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021115120920.GV23425@holomorphy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1474 Lines: 33 Hi! > >> I don't know what to make of highmem on laptops etc., but the VM's > >> conventions should not be that hard to follow; also, there are uses for > >> the swsusp functionality on other kinds of machines (e.g. checkpointing). > >> Pure computationally-oriented systems such as would make use of this > >> are somewhat different from my primary userbase to support, but I think > >> it would be valuable to generalize swsusp in this way, and so provide > >> rudimentary support for such users in addition to some small measure of > >> cleanup (i.e. the cleanup adds functionality). > >> Pavel, what do you think? > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:02:33PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > I definitely want to support swsusp for server boxes, but I'm not 100% > > sure how to do that easily. > > I'm not entirely sure either. Mostly I suspect that the deep arch > issues will be the tough ones, but things like this I can handle. =) Well, I'd really hate to do 64GB support for swsusp for i386. It would mean wider pointers in on-disk format and probably would not be exactly nice. Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/