Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752059AbaFBRXG (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:23:06 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0088.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.88]:59491 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750701AbaFBRXE (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:23:04 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:973:982:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1431:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2691:2693:2828:2892:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:362 X-HE-Tag: stage95_71773c7de9747 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2478 Message-ID: <1401729778.5770.20.camel@joe-AO725> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag From: Joe Perches To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, sbw@mit.edu Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:22:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1401728420-3572-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1401728420-3572-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 10:00 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > A ksummit-discuss email thread looked at the difficulty recruiting > and retaining reviewers. [] > Paul Walmsley also noted the need for patch > submitters to know who the key reviewers are and suggested adding an > "R:" tag to the MAINTAINERS file to record this information on a > per-subsystem basis. I'm not sure of the value of this. Why not just mark the actual reviewers as maintainers? The lack of reviewers problem is entirely distinct from the proposed solution. I believe active reviewers will generally subscribe to a subsystem specific mailing list. Perhaps it'd be better to get a "linux-rcu@vger.kernel.org" mailing list going. > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS [] > @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ Descriptions of section entries: > L: Mailing list that is relevant to this area > W: Web-page with status/info > Q: Patchwork web based patch tracking system site > + R: Designated reviewer, who should be CCed on patches, > + format: FullName > T: SCM tree type and location. > Type is one of: git, hg, quilt, stgit, topgit > S: Status, one of the following: If this is actually done, I suggest putting this "R" entry description immediately after the "M" entry. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/