Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753186AbaFBSzO (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 14:55:14 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:57857 "EHLO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751286AbaFBSzM (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 14:55:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:55:04 -0700 From: josh@joshtriplett.org To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Joe Perches , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, sbw@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag Message-ID: <20140602185504.GA13569@cloud> References: <1401728420-3572-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1401729778.5770.20.camel@joe-AO725> <20140602174837.GA13257@cloud> <1401731968.7323.4.camel@joe-AO725> <20140602181658.GX22231@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1401734669.7323.20.camel@joe-AO725> <20140602145020.400d4e0c@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140602145020.400d4e0c@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 02:50:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:44:29 -0700 > Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 11:16 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > But there have been people who have found serious issues in RCU patches > > > who I would not trust as full maintainers. The ability to find defects > > > is valuable in and of itself, and should be recognized as such, even > > > when not accompanied by the rest of the maintainership package. > > > > Maybe, but odd-lot reviewers are most likely going to find > > these same defects regardless of any "R" designation in > > MAINTAINERS. > > > > Actually, I'm thinking the R: tag is a good idea and we should have > people ask to be added to MAINTAINERS if they want to review certain > subsystems. Grant you, it should be people that the maintainers trust. > I can think of several people I would like to be added as R: in tracing. > > The point is, when patches go out, it is easy to see who the Cc list > should be. And perhaps this will get patches reviewed more. Maybe > maintainers of other subsystems should ask to have the R: tag added for > something they don't maintain but want to help out in. That's exactly the idea: this should go along with a change to get_maintainer.pl to add those folks to the CC list. - Josh Triplett -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/