Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752242AbaFBTOc (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:14:32 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:22974 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752036AbaFBTOb (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:14:31 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,958,1392192000"; d="scan'208";a="550400895" Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 22:14:16 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: eric ernst Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.gross@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PINCTRL: Warn if direct IRQ GPIO set to output Message-ID: <20140602191416.GD1730@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1401218804-77997-1-git-send-email-eric.ernst@linux.intel.com> <20140530084822.GC1645@lahna.fi.intel.com> <538CC3E4.2080700@linux.intel.com> <20140602191322.GC1730@lahna.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140602191322.GC1730@lahna.fi.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:13:22PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:35:16AM -0700, eric ernst wrote: > > On 14-05-30 01:48 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > >On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:26:44PM -0700, eric.ernst@linux.intel.com wrote: > > >>From: Eric Ernst > > >> > > >>For Baytrail, you should never set a GPIO set to direct_irq > > >>to output mode. When direct_irq_en is set for a GPIO, it is > > >>tied directly to an APIC internally, and making the pad output > > >>does not make any sense. Assert a WARN() in the event this happens. > > >Can't we just clear that flag when the GPIO is requested? Or is this > > >something which can't be done at this point? > > The IRQ setting for that register (the IRQ wiring via direct_irq_en) should > > be set statically on boot, and should not be changed, let alone allowing for > > multiple changes during runtime. > > OK. > > Please then follow the coding conventions documented in > Documentation/SubmittingPatches and also check that Documentation/CodingStyle, that is. > scripts/checkpatch.pl doesn't complain too much. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/