Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753905AbaFBUjH (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:39:07 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:40336 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752169AbaFBUjE (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:39:04 -0400 Message-ID: <538CE0E0.8020002@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 13:38:56 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches , Andrew Morton CC: "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, sbw@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] rcu: Add Josh Triplett as designated reviewer References: <1401728420-3572-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1401728420-3572-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140602133512.6d3f584314ecc423e63ffc8e@linux-foundation.org> <1401741411.7323.36.camel@joe-AO725> In-Reply-To: <1401741411.7323.36.camel@joe-AO725> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/02/2014 01:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 13:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:00:20 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: >> >>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>> @@ -7321,6 +7321,7 @@ F: kernel/rcu/torture.c >>> >>> RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK >>> M: "Paul E. McKenney" >>> +R: Josh Triplett >>> L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> S: Supported >>> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git >> >> I like the general principle - knowing who to poke regarding a kernel >> change is useful. >> >> I don't care much whether it's "M:" or "R:", although "R:" carries more >> meaning and hence is probably better. >> >> But why not "Cc:"? That's meaningful too and is more copy-n-paste friendly. Josh, what are you assuming that Andrew and I did not? -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/