Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932122AbaFCACx (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 20:02:53 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:60279 "EHLO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753206AbaFCACw (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 20:02:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:02:46 -0700 From: josh@joshtriplett.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Joe Perches , Andrew Morton , "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, sbw@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] rcu: Add Josh Triplett as designated reviewer Message-ID: <20140603000246.GC14801@cloud> References: <1401728420-3572-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1401728420-3572-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140602133512.6d3f584314ecc423e63ffc8e@linux-foundation.org> <1401741411.7323.36.camel@joe-AO725> <538CE0E0.8020002@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <538CE0E0.8020002@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:38:56PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 06/02/2014 01:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 13:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:00:20 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > >> > >>> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >>> @@ -7321,6 +7321,7 @@ F: kernel/rcu/torture.c > >>> > >>> RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK > >>> M: "Paul E. McKenney" > >>> +R: Josh Triplett > >>> L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >>> S: Supported > >>> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git > >> > >> I like the general principle - knowing who to poke regarding a kernel > >> change is useful. > >> > >> I don't care much whether it's "M:" or "R:", although "R:" carries more > >> meaning and hence is probably better. > >> > >> But why not "Cc:"? That's meaningful too and is more copy-n-paste friendly. > > Josh, what are you assuming that Andrew and I did not? Not sure what you mean here. Responding to the text you quoted: I have no particular need to bikeshed the tag name, so if you prefer "Cc" and can convince get_maintainer.pl to handle it, fine by me. - Josh Triplett -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/