Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:20:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:20:01 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:11757 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:20:00 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:24:03 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Khoa Huynh cc: Alan Cox , "David S. Miller" , Jeff Garzik , kniht@us.ibm.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org, mailing-lists@digitaleric.net Subject: Re: Bugzilla bug tracking database for 2.5 now available. Message-ID: <470862895.1037373843@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 911 Lines: 27 > Well, it's not 10 billion items, but closer to....60 :-) And > the current component list is pretty complete, right? No it's not. > We don't > want to add anything that is not included in the official trees. What do you mean by that? Bugs or components? And which are the "offical" trees? > By the way, have you looked at Red Hat Bugzilla? They have > several hundreds of components in a single scroll-down list > (they define a component as a package). Of course, the list is > alphabetical, so it's not too bad to use it. > > So I think 60+ is definitely a manageable number. Disagree. That's why we didn't go for a flat list in the first place. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/