Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:03:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:03:08 -0500 Received: from AGrenoble-101-1-5-56.abo.wanadoo.fr ([80.11.136.56]:47879 "EHLO microsoft.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:03:08 -0500 Subject: Re: Reserving "special" port numbers in the kernel ? From: Xavier Bestel To: Arun Sharma Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: Message-Id: <1037405489.8019.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.1 (Preview Release) Date: 16 Nov 2002 01:11:30 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 788 Lines: 18 Le sam 16/11/2002 ? 01:00, Arun Sharma a écrit? : > One of the Intel server platforms has a magic port number (623) that > it uses for remote server management. However, neither the kernel nor > glibc are aware of this special port. > > As a result, when someone requests a privileged port using > bindresvport(3), they may get this port back and bad things happen. > > Has anyone run into this or similar problems before ? Thoughts on > what's the right place to handle this issue ? run a dummy app at startup which reserves that port ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/