Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751995AbaFCVqf (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:46:35 -0400 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.232]:17830 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750734AbaFCVqe (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:46:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:46:31 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: Dave Chinner , josh@joshtriplett.org, Joe Perches , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, sbw@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag Message-ID: <20140603174631.2de89352@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20140603205253.GC25483@thunk.org> References: <20140602185504.GA13569@cloud> <1401735917.7323.23.camel@joe-AO725> <20140602190951.GA13648@cloud> <1401736666.7323.25.camel@joe-AO725> <20140602231949.GV14410@dastard> <20140602235915.GB14801@cloud> <20140603011125.GW14410@dastard> <20140602213045.26219ddb@gandalf.local.home> <20140603071654.GC14410@dastard> <20140603134347.6e39f946@gandalf.local.home> <20140603205253.GC25483@thunk.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 16:52:53 -0400 Theodore Ts'o wrote: > The important thing to note here is that we do not have consensus > across all subsystems what Reviewed-by: means, and I think that's OK. > The Reviewed-by: is mostly of interest to the maintainer before the > patch is submitted to mainline. The value of keeping it in the git > commit logs after the fact seems to be a bit variable, although if > there are companies blindly using it as a performance metric and this > is driving down the quality of reviews, perhaps one could even argue > that including these tags in the git commit logs is actually adding > negative value. But I don't really care about that issue, because > like most maintainers, I know the reviewers by reputation, and whether > someone actually says "you can add my Reviewed-by" is actually not so > important as their comments on the patch, one way or another. I prefer the Reviewed-by tags in the git commit. If something is screwed up in a commit, I can blame the reviewers just as much as I can blame the author :-) -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/