Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:23:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:23:47 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:3473 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:23:47 -0500 Message-ID: <3DD5BBD9.7DA70FFF@digeo.com> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:30:33 -0800 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.46 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Con Kolivas CC: linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47-mm3 with contest References: <200211161422.17438.conman@kolivas.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Nov 2002 03:30:37.0494 (UTC) FILETIME=[87B34D60:01C28D20] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 768 Lines: 17 Con Kolivas wrote: > > Note the significant discrepancy between mm1 and mm3. This reminds me of what > happened last time I enabled shared 3rd level pagetables - Andrew do you want > me to do a set of numbers with this disabled? That certainly couldn't hurt. But your tests are, in general, tesging the IO scheduler. And the IO scheduler has changed radically in each of the recent -mm's. So testing with rbtree-iosched reverted would really be the only way to draw comparisons on how the rest of the code is behaving. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/