Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753191AbaFDPnO (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2014 11:43:14 -0400 Received: from mail-ve0-f173.google.com ([209.85.128.173]:50478 "EHLO mail-ve0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751701AbaFDPnN (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2014 11:43:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140604153159.GA27096@infradead.org> References: <20140509120733.GA27918@kernel.org> <20140509150018.GA26215@infradead.org> <20140510040023.GA13788@kernel.org> <5388912F.7010609@kernel.dk> <20140604111133.GA7826@infradead.org> <538F2A11.4060800@kernel.dk> <20140604142012.GA20056@infradead.org> <538F331F.60101@kernel.dk> <20140604145803.GA7826@infradead.org> <538F34FB.7050003@kernel.dk> <20140604153159.GA27096@infradead.org> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 23:43:11 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch]blk-mq: blk_mq_tag_to_rq should handle flush request From: Ming Lei To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , Shaohua Li , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> >scsi_mq_find_tag only gets the scsi host, which may have multiple >> >queues. When called from scsi_find_tag we actually have a scsi device, >> >so that's not an issue, but when called from scsi_host_find_tag the >> >driver only provides the host. >> >> Only solution I see right now is to have the flush_rq in the shared >> tags, but that would potentially be a regression for multiple >> devices and heavy flush uses cases. I'll see if I can come up with >> something better, or maybe Shaohua has an idea. > > What about something like the following (untest, uncompiled, maybe > pseudo-code): > > struct request *blk_mq_tag_to_rq(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, unsigned int tag) > { > struct request *rq = tags->rqs[tag]; > > if ((rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH_SEQ) && rq->q->flush_rq->tag == tag) > return rq->q->flush_rq; > return rq; > } Looks we thought it together, :-) Also maybe the flush_rq->tag need to be cleared in flush_end_io(). Thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/