Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751883AbaFDQ7b (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:59:31 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:25891 "EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750822AbaFDQ7a (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2014 12:59:30 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,974,1392159600"; d="scan'208";a="65463618" Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 18:59:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Jens Axboe cc: scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/10] cciss: use safer test on the result of find_first_zero_bit In-Reply-To: <538F4F99.2020502@kernel.dk> Message-ID: References: <20140604145135.GC6970@beardog.cce.hp.com> <538F4F99.2020502@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 06/04/2014 08:51 AM, scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote: > >> Find_first_zero_bit considers BITS_PER_LONG bits at a time, and thus may > >> return a larger number than the maximum position argument if that position > >> is not a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG. > >> > >> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: > >> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > >> > >> // > >> @@ > >> expression e1,e2,e3; > >> statement S1,S2; > >> @@ > >> > >> e1 = find_first_zero_bit(e2,e3) > >> ... > >> if (e1 > >> - == > >> + >= > >> e3) > >> S1 else S2 > >> // > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall > >> > >> --- > >> drivers/block/cciss.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff -u -p a/drivers/block/cciss.c b/drivers/block/cciss.c > >> --- a/drivers/block/cciss.c > >> +++ b/drivers/block/cciss.c > >> @@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static CommandList_struct *cmd_alloc(ctl > >> > >> do { > >> i = find_first_zero_bit(h->cmd_pool_bits, h->nr_cmds); > >> - if (i == h->nr_cmds) > >> + if (i >= h->nr_cmds) > >> return NULL; > >> } while (test_and_set_bit(i, h->cmd_pool_bits) != 0); > >> c = h->cmd_pool + i; > > > > > > Thanks. Ack. > > > > You can add > > > > Reviewed-by: Stephen M. Cameron > > > > to this patch if you want. > > > > You might consider adding "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" into the > > sign-off area as well. > > There are two such instances in cciss.c, btw. Actually, there seem to be three, and I didn't find the other two because the assignment is inlined into the test. But the patch isn't needed anyway, because it turns out that the result never goes over the bound value. thanks, julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/