Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751653AbaFEIW4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2014 04:22:56 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:44299 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750840AbaFEIWy (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2014 04:22:54 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 10:22:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ingo Molnar cc: Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Davidlohr Bueso , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Paul E. McKenney" , Andrew Morton , Peter Anvin Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] locking tree changes for v3.16 In-Reply-To: <20140605081915.GD4926@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20140603114821.GA23711@gmail.com> <1401832251.8843.3.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140604103003.GE11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140604172220.GI13930@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140605081915.GD4926@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > I _think_ tip/locking/core is empty and you could pull that into your > > > tree without getting tons of extra weird stuff, but if you prefer a tree > > > based on your git tree I'll have to do some manual stuff but that is > > > certainly possible. > > > > I'd actually prefer against something like the v3.15-rc8 tag, just so > > that the tree is otherwise "pristine". > > > > > Also, this 'obviously' does not have the normal tip build coverage, > > > because I usually rely on the tip build robots to do that. But it does > > > build and run for all my local machines. > > > > It would be great to have Davidlohr go over it too, and if possible > > have it run through the build robots. [...] > > The build/boot robots found breakage and that is why its first > iteration was removed, I didn't have fundamental objections. I'll queue Peters lot up and we let Davidlohr and Fengguang lose on it. I run it through my own machinery, so that should work out. ok? Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/