Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 07:13:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 07:13:15 -0500 Received: from supreme.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.34]:61882 "EHLO pcug.org.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 07:13:15 -0500 Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:19:33 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Alan Cox Cc: tomita@cinet.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PC-9800 on 2.5.47-ac5 Message-Id: <20021117231933.0a40d319.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <1037494049.24777.37.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <3DD6DADC.F5BE96E6@cinet.co.jp> <1037494049.24777.37.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 737 Lines: 18 On 17 Nov 2002 00:47:28 +0000 Alan Cox wrote: > > Thanks - I'm trying to fold bits in one at a time and to avoid lots of > messy ifdefs. BTW - have you tested the APM change as it seems to have > more pushes than pops for the stack ? I assumed that the PC-9800 must be using an iret instead of ret to get back from the APM BIOS. This is, of course, broken ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/