Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 19:56:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Pranith Kumar <pranith@gatech.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, davidlohr@hp.com,
        mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] cleanup: use bool as return type for
 rwsem_is_locked
Message-ID: <20140606175655.GX13930@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <5390D7E1.7060606@gatech.edu>
 <5391FFFD.1060901@gatech.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <5391FFFD.1060901@gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:53:01PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Now in general, I don't particularly like such superfluous changes, so
> > unless you can show that GCC actually generates better code, I'd prefer
> > to keep things as they are.
> 
> Fixed and checked the assembly. It saves us 2 bytes of code, not much. I am not sure if that is worth it :(

still 2 bytes, so sure.

Which gcc did you use and what arch did you build? That might be useful
info for the changelog.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/