Message-ID: <53922054.6020108@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 13:11:00 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
CC: jwboyer@fedoraproject.org, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pte_present check on hugetlb_entry fix for 3.15?
References: <20140606173546.GA1869@zod>	<53920c95.685a8c0a.2111.ffffe52fSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <20140606115919.df17197c7182a0f7ed59c3a9@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140606115919.df17197c7182a0f7ed59c3a9@linux-foundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On 06/06/2014 11:59 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri,  6 Jun 2014 14:46:37 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:36:54PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> Hi Naoya,
>>>
>>> I noticed that your
>>> mm-add-pte_present-check-on-existing-hugetlb_entry-callbacks.patch in
>>> Andrew's -mm tree has been queued for a while and has a CC to stable on
>>> it.  Is that something that should get into 3.15?
>>
>> I'm not sure. I guess Andrew will decide this in a few days.
> 
> I was planning on doing so but then Dave popped up with an alternative
> which rather blew a hole in things.

This one patch is independent from what I was posting.  I don't think my
patch would have had any effect on the behavior this one is fixing.

IOW, don't hold it up for my (or my patches) benefit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/