Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752088AbaFFUTr (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:19:47 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39888 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751620AbaFFUTq (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:19:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 13:19:44 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Dave Hansen Cc: Naoya Horiguchi , jwboyer@fedoraproject.org, Sasha Levin , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pte_present check on hugetlb_entry fix for 3.15? Message-Id: <20140606131944.8302a87925711fb91e0a10db@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <53922054.6020108@intel.com> References: <20140606173546.GA1869@zod> <53920c95.685a8c0a.2111.ffffe52fSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <20140606115919.df17197c7182a0f7ed59c3a9@linux-foundation.org> <53922054.6020108@intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 13:11:00 -0700 Dave Hansen wrote: > On 06/06/2014 11:59 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 14:46:37 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:36:54PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > >>> Hi Naoya, > >>> > >>> I noticed that your > >>> mm-add-pte_present-check-on-existing-hugetlb_entry-callbacks.patch in > >>> Andrew's -mm tree has been queued for a while and has a CC to stable on > >>> it. Is that something that should get into 3.15? > >> > >> I'm not sure. I guess Andrew will decide this in a few days. > > > > I was planning on doing so but then Dave popped up with an alternative > > which rather blew a hole in things. > > This one patch is independent from what I was posting. I don't think my > patch would have had any effect on the behavior this one is fixing. > > IOW, don't hold it up for my (or my patches) benefit. I was referring to these, which remain in limbo: mm-hugetlbfs-fix-rmapping-for-anonymous-hugepages-with-page_pgoff.patch mm-hugetlbfs-fix-rmapping-for-anonymous-hugepages-with-page_pgoff-v2.patch mm-hugetlbfs-fix-rmapping-for-anonymous-hugepages-with-page_pgoff-v3.patch mm-hugetlbfs-fix-rmapping-for-anonymous-hugepages-with-page_pgoff-v3-fix.patch pagewalk-update-page-table-walker-core.patch pagewalk-update-page-table-walker-core-fix-end-address-calculation-in-walk_page_range.patch pagewalk-update-page-table-walker-core-fix-end-address-calculation-in-walk_page_range-fix.patch pagewalk-update-page-table-walker-core-fix.patch pagewalk-add-walk_page_vma.patch smaps-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch clear_refs-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch pagemap-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch pagemap-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker-fix.patch numa_maps-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch memcg-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch arch-powerpc-mm-subpage-protc-use-walk_page_vma-instead-of-walk_page_range.patch pagewalk-remove-argument-hmask-from-hugetlb_entry.patch pagewalk-remove-argument-hmask-from-hugetlb_entry-fix.patch pagewalk-remove-argument-hmask-from-hugetlb_entry-fix-fix.patch mempolicy-apply-page-table-walker-on-queue_pages_range.patch mm-add-pte_present-check-on-existing-hugetlb_entry-callbacks.patch mm-pagewalkc-move-pte-null-check.patch mm-prom-pid-clear_refs-avoid-split_huge_page.patch Some energy in driving all this toward some sort of conclusion would be appreciated. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/