Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:51:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:51:57 -0500 Received: from almesberger.net ([63.105.73.239]:58897 "EHLO host.almesberger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:51:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 02:58:43 -0300 From: Werner Almesberger To: Oliver Xymoron Cc: "David S. Miller" , mbligh@aracnet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bugzilla bug tracking database for 2.5 now available. Message-ID: <20021118025843.A17062@almesberger.net> References: <20021115.133004.65979948.davem@redhat.com> <467166910.1037370147@[10.10.2.3]> <20021117.113319.126503551.davem@redhat.com> <20021117233104.M1407@almesberger.net> <20021118044614.GB20171@waste.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021118044614.GB20171@waste.org>; from oxymoron@waste.org on Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 10:46:14PM -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 950 Lines: 21 Oliver Xymoron wrote: > There's a good example extant where this isn't a problem: Wikipedia. > In their example, vandalism increases, but so does clean-up. Oh, don't get me wrong - I'm not advocating iron-clad control with a big bureaucracy. I simply suspect that the clean-up might be a lot more work that the act of stupidity. (So, if Bugzilla doesn't already track actions by user, with some convenient batch undo function, this would be a feature request :-) - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/