Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 02:49:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 02:49:04 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:15842 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 02:49:03 -0500 Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:52:51 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Oliver Xymoron , Werner Almesberger cc: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bugzilla bug tracking database for 2.5 now available. Message-ID: <674189713.1037577169@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <20021118044614.GB20171@waste.org> References: <20021118044614.GB20171@waste.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 871 Lines: 19 > There's a good example extant where this isn't a problem: Wikipedia. > In their example, vandalism increases, but so does clean-up. Dave's > idea lets us scale the number of Bugzilla janitors. We won't get > perfect scaling, but it's much better than not scaling. I'm all for scaling the number of janitors, but not to any random moron with an easily created free email address. And it's not just malicious damage, it's too easy for people to close of things as duplicates because they look similar-ish. People need to have a certain level of skill and trust - I'm not going to open this up into a total free-for-all. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/