Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936130AbaFJA2t (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2014 20:28:49 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58794 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934381AbaFJA2r (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2014 20:28:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:32:34 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Eric Paris , Linus Torvalds , linux-audit@redhat.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] auditsc: audit_krule mask accesses need bounds checking Message-ID: <20140610003234.GB20728@kroah.com> References: <1401332999-15167-1-git-send-email-eparis@redhat.com> <20140609223057.GB18475@kroah.com> <20140609224645.GA8113@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:55:20PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > >> >> From: Andy Lutomirski > >> >> > >> >> Fixes an easy DoS and possible information disclosure. > >> >> > >> >> This does nothing about the broken state of x32 auditing. > >> >> > >> >> eparis: If the admin has enabled auditd and has specifically loaded audit > >> >> rules. This bug has been around since before git. Wow... > >> >> > >> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > >> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski > >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris > >> >> --- > >> >> kernel/auditsc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++--------- > >> >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > Did this patch get dropped somewhere? Isn't it a valid bugfix, or did I > >> > miss a later conversation about this? > >> > >> Hmm. It seems that it didn't make it into Linus' tree. Crap. > >> > >> IMO we need some kind of real tracking system for issues reported to > >> security@. > > > > That seems to be my mbox at times :) > > > > But yes, having something "real" might be good if the load gets higher, > > right now it's so low that my "sweep pending security patches" task > > usually catches anything pending, which is rare. > > > > There are currently at least two issues that I reported that are stuck > in limbo: this one and the (not-yet-public) vfs thing. That was next on my list to poke people about... > And there's the CVE-2014-0181 regression fix that almost got > forgotten, but that isn't really a security issue. What is that, where was that reported? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/