Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936125AbaFJAsv (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2014 20:48:51 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58173 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933020AbaFJAVy (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2014 20:21:54 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Vince Weaver , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar Subject: [PATCH 3.4 04/88] perf: Fix race in removing an event Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:24:14 -0700 Message-Id: <20140610002424.696752362@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.0 In-Reply-To: <20140610002424.500996570@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20140610002424.500996570@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.63-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Peter Zijlstra commit 46ce0fe97a6be7532ce6126bb26ce89fed81528c upstream. When removing a (sibling) event we do: raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock); perf_group_detach(event); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock); perf_remove_from_context(event); raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock); ... raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock); Now, assuming the event is a sibling, it will be 'unreachable' for things like ctx_sched_out() because that iterates the groups->siblings, and we just unhooked the sibling. So, if during we get ctx_sched_out(), it will miss the event and not call event_sched_out() on it, leaving it programmed on the PMU. The subsequent perf_remove_from_context() call will find the ctx is inactive and only call list_del_event() to remove the event from all other lists. Hereafter we can proceed to free the event; while still programmed! Close this hole by moving perf_group_detach() inside the same ctx->lock region(s) perf_remove_from_context() has. The condition on inherited events only in __perf_event_exit_task() is likely complete crap because non-inherited events are part of groups too and we're tearing down just the same. But leave that for another patch. Most-likely-Fixes: e03a9a55b4e ("perf: Change close() semantics for group events") Reported-by: Vince Weaver Tested-by: Vince Weaver Much-staring-at-traces-by: Vince Weaver Much-staring-at-traces-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140505093124.GN17778@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/events/core.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -1196,6 +1196,11 @@ group_sched_out(struct perf_event *group cpuctx->exclusive = 0; } +struct remove_event { + struct perf_event *event; + bool detach_group; +}; + /* * Cross CPU call to remove a performance event * @@ -1204,12 +1209,15 @@ group_sched_out(struct perf_event *group */ static int __perf_remove_from_context(void *info) { - struct perf_event *event = info; + struct remove_event *re = info; + struct perf_event *event = re->event; struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx; struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx); raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock); event_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx); + if (re->detach_group) + perf_group_detach(event); list_del_event(event, ctx); if (!ctx->nr_events && cpuctx->task_ctx == ctx) { ctx->is_active = 0; @@ -1234,10 +1242,14 @@ static int __perf_remove_from_context(vo * When called from perf_event_exit_task, it's OK because the * context has been detached from its task. */ -static void perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event) +static void perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event, bool detach_group) { struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx; struct task_struct *task = ctx->task; + struct remove_event re = { + .event = event, + .detach_group = detach_group, + }; lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex); @@ -1246,12 +1258,12 @@ static void perf_remove_from_context(str * Per cpu events are removed via an smp call and * the removal is always successful. */ - cpu_function_call(event->cpu, __perf_remove_from_context, event); + cpu_function_call(event->cpu, __perf_remove_from_context, &re); return; } retry: - if (!task_function_call(task, __perf_remove_from_context, event)) + if (!task_function_call(task, __perf_remove_from_context, &re)) return; raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock); @@ -1268,6 +1280,8 @@ retry: * Since the task isn't running, its safe to remove the event, us * holding the ctx->lock ensures the task won't get scheduled in. */ + if (detach_group) + perf_group_detach(event); list_del_event(event, ctx); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock); } @@ -2962,10 +2976,7 @@ int perf_event_release_kernel(struct per * to trigger the AB-BA case. */ mutex_lock_nested(&ctx->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); - raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock); - perf_group_detach(event); - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock); - perf_remove_from_context(event); + perf_remove_from_context(event, true); mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex); free_event(event); @@ -6505,7 +6516,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, struct perf_event_context *gctx = group_leader->ctx; mutex_lock(&gctx->mutex); - perf_remove_from_context(group_leader); + perf_remove_from_context(group_leader, false); /* * Removing from the context ends up with disabled @@ -6515,7 +6526,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, perf_event__state_init(group_leader); list_for_each_entry(sibling, &group_leader->sibling_list, group_entry) { - perf_remove_from_context(sibling); + perf_remove_from_context(sibling, false); perf_event__state_init(sibling); put_ctx(gctx); } @@ -6668,13 +6679,7 @@ __perf_event_exit_task(struct perf_event struct perf_event_context *child_ctx, struct task_struct *child) { - if (child_event->parent) { - raw_spin_lock_irq(&child_ctx->lock); - perf_group_detach(child_event); - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&child_ctx->lock); - } - - perf_remove_from_context(child_event); + perf_remove_from_context(child_event, !!child_event->parent); /* * It can happen that the parent exits first, and has events @@ -7159,14 +7164,14 @@ static void perf_pmu_rotate_stop(struct static void __perf_event_exit_context(void *__info) { + struct remove_event re = { .detach_group = false }; struct perf_event_context *ctx = __info; - struct perf_event *event; perf_pmu_rotate_stop(ctx->pmu); rcu_read_lock(); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) - __perf_remove_from_context(event); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(re.event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) + __perf_remove_from_context(&re); rcu_read_unlock(); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/