Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752598AbaFJNyE (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:54:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:49128 "EHLO mail-pd0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752068AbaFJNyB (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:54:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH ftrace/core 2/2] ftrace, kprobes: Support IPMODIFY flag to find IP modify conflict From: Namhyung Kim To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Steven Rostedt , Josh Poimboeuf , Ingo Molnar , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20140610105014.8732.43086.stgit@kbuild-fedora.novalocal> References: <20140610105001.8732.93502.stgit@kbuild-fedora.novalocal> <20140610105014.8732.43086.stgit@kbuild-fedora.novalocal> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:53:55 +0900 Message-ID: <1402408435.1676.13.camel@leonhard> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Masami, 2014-06-10 (화), 10:50 +0000, Masami Hiramatsu: > Introduce FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY to avoid conflict among > ftrace users who may modify regs->ip to change the execution > path. This also adds the flag to kprobe_ftrace_ops, since > ftrace-based kprobes already modifies regs->ip. Thus, if > another user modifies the regs->ip on the same function entry, > one of them will be broken. So both should add IPMODIFY flag > and make sure that ftrace_set_filter_ip() succeeds. > > Note that currently conflicts of IPMODIFY are detected on the > filter hash. It does NOT care about the notrace hash. This means > that if you set filter hash all functions and notrace(mask) > some of them, the IPMODIFY flag will be applied to all > functions. > [SNIP] > +static int __ftrace_hash_update_ipmodify(struct ftrace_ops *ops, > + struct ftrace_hash *old_hash, > + struct ftrace_hash *new_hash) > +{ > + struct ftrace_page *pg; > + struct dyn_ftrace *rec, *end = NULL; > + int in_old, in_new; > + > + /* Only update if the ops has been registered */ > + if (!(ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_ENABLED)) > + return 0; > + > + if (!(ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS) || > + !(ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY)) > + return 0; > + > + /* Update rec->flags */ > + do_for_each_ftrace_rec(pg, rec) { > + /* We need to update only differences of filter_hash */ > + in_old = !old_hash || ftrace_lookup_ip(old_hash, rec->ip); > + in_new = !new_hash || ftrace_lookup_ip(new_hash, rec->ip); Why not use ftrace_hash_empty() here instead of checking NULL? Also return value of ftrace_lookup_ip is not boolean.. maybe you need to add !! or convert type of the in_{old,new} to bool. > + if (in_old == in_new) > + continue; > + > + if (in_new) { > + /* New entries must ensure no others are using it */ > + if (rec->flags & FTRACE_FL_IPMODIFY) > + goto rollback; > + rec->flags |= FTRACE_FL_IPMODIFY; > + } else /* Removed entry */ > + rec->flags &= ~FTRACE_FL_IPMODIFY; > + } while_for_each_ftrace_rec(); > + > + return 0; > + > +rollback: > + end = rec; > + > + /* Roll back what we did above */ > + do_for_each_ftrace_rec(pg, rec) { > + if (rec == end) > + goto err_out; > + > + in_old = !old_hash || ftrace_lookup_ip(old_hash, rec->ip); > + in_new = !new_hash || ftrace_lookup_ip(new_hash, rec->ip); > + if (in_old == in_new) > + continue; > + > + if (in_new) > + rec->flags &= ~FTRACE_FL_IPMODIFY; > + else > + rec->flags |= FTRACE_FL_IPMODIFY; > + } while_for_each_ftrace_rec(); > + > +err_out: > + return -EBUSY; > +} > + > +static int ftrace_hash_ipmodify_enable(struct ftrace_ops *ops) > +{ > + struct ftrace_hash *hash = ops->filter_hash; > + > + if (ftrace_hash_empty(hash)) > + hash = NULL; > + > + return __ftrace_hash_update_ipmodify(ops, EMPTY_HASH, hash); > +} Please see above comment. You can pass an empty hash as is, or pass NULL as second arg. The same goes to below... Thanks, Namhyung > + > +/* Disabling always succeeds */ > +static void ftrace_hash_ipmodify_disable(struct ftrace_ops *ops) > +{ > + struct ftrace_hash *hash = ops->filter_hash; > + > + if (ftrace_hash_empty(hash)) > + hash = NULL; > + > + __ftrace_hash_update_ipmodify(ops, hash, EMPTY_HASH); > +} > + > +static int ftrace_hash_ipmodify_update(struct ftrace_ops *ops, > + struct ftrace_hash *new_hash) > +{ > + struct ftrace_hash *old_hash = ops->filter_hash; > + > + if (ftrace_hash_empty(old_hash)) > + old_hash = NULL; > + > + if (ftrace_hash_empty(new_hash)) > + new_hash = NULL; > + > + return __ftrace_hash_update_ipmodify(ops, old_hash, new_hash); > +} > + -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/