Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751163AbaFJQF6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:05:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:61225 "EHLO mail-pd0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750740AbaFJQF4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:05:56 -0400 Message-ID: <53972CE1.1060209@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:05:53 -0700 From: Dirk Brandewie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stratos Karafotis , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Dirk Brandewie CC: dirk.brandewie@gmail.com, "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid duplicate call of intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy References: <53962067.4060504@semaphore.gr> In-Reply-To: <53962067.4060504@semaphore.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/09/2014 02:00 PM, Stratos Karafotis wrote: > Store busy_scaled value to avoid to duplicate call of > intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy on every sampling interval. > The second call *only* happens if the tracepoint is being used otherwise the whole function call to trace_pstate_sample() is a noop. This makes the code less readable IMHO the reader is left wondering how cpu->sample.busy_scaled was set in intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate() > Also, rename the function to intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy. > > Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis > --- > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > index 4e7f492..31e2ae5 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static inline int32_t div_fp(int32_t x, int32_t y) > > struct sample { > int32_t core_pct_busy; > + int32_t busy_scaled; > u64 aperf; > u64 mperf; > int freq; > @@ -604,7 +605,7 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_set_sample_time(struct cpudata *cpu) > mod_timer_pinned(&cpu->timer, jiffies + delay); > } > > -static inline int32_t intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu) > +static inline void intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu) > { > int32_t core_busy, max_pstate, current_pstate, sample_ratio; > u32 duration_us; > @@ -624,20 +625,19 @@ static inline int32_t intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu) > core_busy = mul_fp(core_busy, sample_ratio); > } > > - return core_busy; > + cpu->sample.busy_scaled = core_busy; > } > > static inline void intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu) > { > - int32_t busy_scaled; > struct _pid *pid; > signed int ctl = 0; > int steps; > > pid = &cpu->pid; > - busy_scaled = intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(cpu); > + intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy(cpu); > > - ctl = pid_calc(pid, busy_scaled); > + ctl = pid_calc(pid, cpu->sample.busy_scaled); > > steps = abs(ctl); > > @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_timer_func(unsigned long __data) > intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(cpu); > > trace_pstate_sample(fp_toint(sample->core_pct_busy), > - fp_toint(intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(cpu)), > + fp_toint(sample->busy_scaled), > cpu->pstate.current_pstate, > sample->mperf, > sample->aperf, > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/