Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754732AbaFJUrg (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:47:36 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41426 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754513AbaFJUre (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:47:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:44:14 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Alex Thorlton Cc: Linux EFI , LKML , Matt Fleming , Russ Anderson Subject: efi_call on SGI Message-ID: <20140610204414.GB29302@pd.tnic> References: <20140609200017.GD2700@sgi.com> <20140610080300.GA28607@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140610080300.GA28607@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Btw, while we're at it, I see uv_bios_call is sometimes done with preemption disabled around it and sometimes it is not (at least I don't see it)... In any case, if SGI uses the EFI pagetable now too, you probably would want to do the efi calls like the rest of x86 does them - see the 64-bit version of efi_call_virt() in arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h for an example what I mean. Now, you could either copy that macro or you could accomodate it to serve everyone's needs - depends on what you'd prefer. I'm just saying - I had stumbled across this while the debugging session was going on and wanted to point that out but it wasn't too important at the time so... HTH. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/