Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753718AbaFKBl0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:41:26 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0231.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.231]:60342 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751255AbaFKBlZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:41:25 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:966:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2196:2198:2199:2200:2393:2551:2553:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:4321:4385:5007:7652:7775:7903:7904:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12050:12517:12519:12663:12740:13069:13311:13357,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: plate74_8067608e02834 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1746 Message-ID: <1402450879.4082.6.camel@joe-AO725> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Trivial code cleanup From: Joe Perches To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Stratos Karafotis , Dirk Brandewie , dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com, Viresh Kumar , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , LKML Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:41:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <2859027.TirvIA2s2c@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <5396208F.6070400@semaphore.gr> <1894836.tjrHdJ7Duz@vostro.rjw.lan> <1402435605.4082.3.camel@joe-AO725> <2859027.TirvIA2s2c@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 02:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 02:26:45 PM Joe Perches wrote: > > c89 is 25 years ago now. > Apparently, I'm old. nah, just older than yesterday. No doubt better too. > > > Either way, in my opinion it's better to put the parens into the expression > > > in this particular case to clearly state the intention. > > > > I don't think so. > > Of course, you're free to disagree, but I guess you'll admit that > a * b / c is generally different from b / c * a and if you see something > like this it is hard to say at first sight whether or not this is intentional > or an expression ordering bug. true enough. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/