Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752647AbaFKUUc (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:20:32 -0400 Received: from sema.semaphore.gr ([78.46.194.137]:32910 "EHLO sema.semaphore.gr" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751328AbaFKUUa (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:20:30 -0400 Message-ID: <5398BA0B.7070903@semaphore.gr> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 23:20:27 +0300 From: Stratos Karafotis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Smythies CC: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix rounding of core_pct References: <1402490012-19969-1-git-send-email-stratosk@semaphore.gr> <009b01cf857a$d5032090$7f0961b0$@net> <539862DB.9060905@semaphore.gr> <00a001cf8586$24eb5c70$6ec21550$@net> In-Reply-To: <00a001cf8586$24eb5c70$6ec21550$@net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/06/2014 06:02 μμ, Doug Smythies wrote: > > On 2104.06.11 07:08 Stratos Karafotis wrote: >> On 11/06/2014 04:41 μμ, Doug Smythies wrote: >> >> No. >> >> The intent was only ever to round properly the pseudo floating point result of the divide. >> It was much more important (ugh, well 4 times more) when FRACBITS was still 6, which also got changed to 8 in a recent patch. >> > > Are you sure? > > Yes. > >> This rounding was very recently added. >> As far as I can understand, I don't see the meaning of this rounding, as is. >> Even if FRAC_BITS was 6, I think it would have almost no improvement in >> calculations. > > Note: I had not seen this e-mail when I wrote a few minutes ago: > > You may be correct. > If Dirk agrees, I will re-analyse the entire driver for rounding effects soon. > When FRACBITS was 6 there were subtle cases where the driver would get stuck, and not make a final pstate change, with the default PID gains. > Other things have changed, and the analysis needs to be re-done. > Could you please elaborate a little bit more what we need these 2 lines below? if ((rem << 1) >= int_tofp(sample->mperf)) core_pct += 1; Because nothing is mentioned for them in commit's changelog. Do we need to round core_pct or not? Because if we try to round it, I think this patch should work. Thanks, Stratos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/