Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754596AbaFKXEd (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:04:33 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com ([209.85.213.177]:35290 "EHLO mail-ig0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753210AbaFKXEc (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:04:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:04:29 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Mark Salter , Michal Nazarewicz , Marek Szyprowski cc: Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix MAX_ORDER for 64K pagesize In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1402522435-13884-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, David Rientjes wrote: > Any reason to not switch this to > > ARM64_64K_PAGES && TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE && CMA > (ARM64_64K_PAGES) && (TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE || CMA) > instead? If pageblock_order > MAX_ORDER because of > HPAGE_SHIFT > PAGE_SHIFT, then cma is always going to be passing a > too-large-order to free_pages_prepare() via this path. > > Adding Michal and Marek to the cc. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/