Date: 11 Jun 2014 21:51:39 -0400
Message-ID: <20140612015139.21573.qmail@ns.horizon.com>
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com>
To: hpa@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux@horizon.com, mingo@kernel.org, price@mit.edu, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: drivers/char/random.c: More futzing about
In-Reply-To: <5398F7F9.9000106@zytor.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

> Sadly I can't find the tree, but I'm 94% sure it was Skein-256
> (specifically the SHA3-256 candidate parameter set.)

It would be nice to have two hash functions, optimized separately for 32-
and 64-bit processors.  As the Skein report says, the algorithm can
be adapted to 32 bits easily enough.

I also did some work a while ago to adapt the Skein parameter search
code to develop a Skein-192 (6x32 bits) that would fit into registers
on x86-32.  (It got stalled when I e-mailed Niels Ferguson about it
and never heard back; it fell off the to-do list while I was waiting.)

The intended target was IPv6 address hashing for sequence number
randomization, but it could be used for pool hashing, too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/