Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933391AbaFLNzI (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:55:08 -0400 Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:45533 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932161AbaFLNzG (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:55:06 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 96.249.243.124 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/Czb7uLRDon499FnV6C7FMEGYEtlaClro= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.1 titan EB00E58DE5C Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:54:53 -0400 From: Jason Cooper To: Sricharan R Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, nm@ti.com, rnayak@ti.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 16/19] irqchip: crossbar: introduce ti,max-crossbar-sources to identify valid crossbar mapping Message-ID: <20140612135453.GB8664@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1402574007-13987-1-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com> <1402574007-13987-17-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1402574007-13987-17-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 05:23:24PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote: > From: Nishanth Menon > > Currently we attempt to map any crossbar value to an IRQ, however, > this is not correct from hardware perspective. There is a max crossbar > event number upto which hardware supports. So describe the same in > device tree using 'ti,max-crossbar-sources' property and use it to > validate requests. > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/crossbar.txt | 2 ++ > drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/crossbar.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/crossbar.txt > index fb88585..6d2e2f5 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/crossbar.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/crossbar.txt > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Required properties: > - compatible : Should be "ti,irq-crossbar" > - reg: Base address and the size of the crossbar registers. > - ti,max-irqs: Total number of irqs available at the interrupt controller. > +- ti,max-crossbar-sources: Maximum number of crossbar sources that can be routed. > - ti,reg-size: Size of a individual register in bytes. Every individual > register is assumed to be of same size. Valid sizes are 1, 2, 4. > - ti,irqs-reserved: List of the reserved irq lines that are not muxed using > @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ Examples: > compatible = "ti,irq-crossbar"; > reg = <0x4a002a48 0x130>; > ti,max-irqs = <160>; > + ti,max-crossbar-sources = <400>; > ti,reg-size = <2>; > ti,irqs-reserved = <0 1 2 3 5 6 131 132 139 140>; > }; > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c > index 2a73a66..cf69c4d 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > /** > * struct crossbar_device - crossbar device descriptio > * @int_max: maximum number of supported interrupts > + * @max_crossbar_sources: Maximum number of crossbar sources > * @irq_map: array of interrupts to crossbar number mapping > * @crossbar_base: crossbar base address > * @register_offsets: offsets for each irq number > @@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ > */ > struct crossbar_device { > uint int_max; > + uint max_crossbar_sources; > uint *irq_map; > void __iomem *crossbar_base; > int *register_offsets; > @@ -126,12 +128,19 @@ static int crossbar_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d, > unsigned int *out_type) > { > int ret; > + int req_num = intspec[1]; > > - ret = get_prev_map_irq(intspec[1]); > + if (req_num >= cb->max_crossbar_sources) { > + pr_err("%s: requested crossbar number %d > max %d\n", > + __func__, req_num, cb->max_crossbar_sources); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + ret = get_prev_map_irq(req_num); > if (ret >= 0) > goto found; > > - ret = allocate_free_irq(intspec[1]); > + ret = allocate_free_irq(req_num); > > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > @@ -164,6 +173,14 @@ static int __init crossbar_of_init(struct device_node *node, > if (!cb->crossbar_base) > goto err_cb; > > + of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,max-crossbar-sources", > + &cb->max_crossbar_sources); > + if (!cb->max_crossbar_sources) { > + pr_err("missing 'ti,max-crossbar-sources' property\n"); > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto err_base; > + } This completely breaks all boards using old dtbs. Please set max_crossbar_sources to a sane value (400) when the property is missing. > + > of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,max-irqs", &max); > if (!max) { > pr_err("missing 'ti,max-irqs' property\n"); I know this is context, but you may want to look at this property as well and set it to a sane value instead of erroring out. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/