Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933618AbaFLN6M (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:58:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43984 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932707AbaFLN6L (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:58:11 -0400 Message-ID: <1402581459.15402.54.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix MAX_ORDER for 64K pagesize From: Mark Salter To: David Rientjes Cc: Michal Nazarewicz , Marek Szyprowski , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:57:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <1402522435-13884-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat, Inc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:04 -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, David Rientjes wrote: > > > Any reason to not switch this to > > > > ARM64_64K_PAGES && TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE && CMA > > > > (ARM64_64K_PAGES) && (TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE || CMA) And add HUGETLB to the list also? I'm not sure of all the trade offs here, so I kept it simple. I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/