Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:11:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:11:55 -0500 Received: from c16688.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.244.54]:1920 "EHLO laptop.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:11:51 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Con Kolivas To: linux kernel mailing list Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.48 with contest Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:19:18 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <200211190819.26444.conman@kolivas.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3897 Lines: 100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Here are the latest contest (http://contest.kolivas.net) benchmarks for 2.5.48 (including experimental load additions) noload: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.18 [5] 71.7 93 0 0 1.00 2.5.47 [3] 73.5 93 0 0 1.03 2.5.47-mm3 [2] 73.7 93 0 0 1.03 2.5.48 [5] 73.9 93 0 0 1.04 cacherun: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.18 [2] 66.6 99 0 0 0.93 2.5.47 [3] 68.3 99 0 0 0.96 2.5.47-mm3 [2] 68.3 99 0 0 0.96 2.5.48 [5] 68.5 99 0 0 0.96 process_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.18 [3] 109.5 57 119 44 1.53 2.5.47 [3] 83.4 82 22 21 1.17 2.5.47-mm3 [2] 84.2 82 22 21 1.18 2.5.48 [5] 86.5 79 26 23 1.21 dbench_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.18 [1] 346.6 20 1 57 4.85 2.5.47 [2] 224.2 33 1 44 3.14 2.5.47-mm3 [2] 201.6 38 1 39 2.82 2.5.48 [5] 236.4 31 1 43 3.31 ctar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.18 [3] 117.4 63 1 7 1.64 2.5.47 [3] 93.9 80 1 5 1.32 2.5.47-mm3 [2] 94.0 81 1 6 1.32 2.5.48 [5] 93.5 81 1 5 1.31 xtar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.18 [3] 150.8 49 2 8 2.11 2.5.47 [3] 167.1 45 2 7 2.34 2.5.47-mm3 [2] 211.3 38 2 6 2.96 2.5.48 [5] 184.4 41 2 6 2.58 This appears to take longer with .48 than .47 io_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.18 [3] 474.1 15 36 10 6.64 2.5.47 [3] 165.9 46 9 9 2.32 2.5.47-mm3 [2] 117.1 65 4 8 1.64 2.5.48 [5] 131.4 59 6 8 1.84 And this appears to take less time read_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.18 [3] 102.3 70 6 3 1.43 2.5.47 [3] 103.4 74 6 4 1.45 2.5.47-mm3 [2] 218.5 34 10 2 3.06 2.5.48 [5] 102.9 74 6 4 1.44 list_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.18 [3] 90.2 76 1 17 1.26 2.5.47 [3] 100.2 71 1 20 1.40 2.5.47-mm3 [2] 101.2 71 1 21 1.42 2.5.48 [5] 98.2 72 1 19 1.38 mem_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.18 [3] 103.3 70 32 3 1.45 2.5.47 [3] 151.1 49 35 2 2.12 2.5.47-mm3 [2] 243.8 31 39 1 3.41 2.5.48 [5] 121.2 61 30 2 1.70 Faster here too. Regards, Con -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE92VlaF6dfvkL3i1gRAtizAJ4o6BmWicNbKGKkMWp+eIh/KejPFACgqe9T ufLDD9vad9qAENLqcmfaYD8= =RRGa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/