Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752197AbaFLTyb (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:54:31 -0400 Received: from g4t3425.houston.hp.com ([15.201.208.53]:10069 "EHLO g4t3425.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751662AbaFLTya (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:54:30 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 91009 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:54:29 EDT Message-ID: <1402602866.9617.16.camel@j-VirtualBox> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mutex: Try to acquire mutex only if it is unlocked From: Jason Low To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, Waiman.Long@hp.com, scott.norton@hp.com, aswin@hp.com Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:54:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1402601825.2627.5.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <1402511843-4721-1-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com> <1402511843-4721-4-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com> <1402601825.2627.5.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 12:37 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 11:37 -0700, Jason Low wrote: > > Upon entering the slowpath in __mutex_lock_common(), we try once more to > > acquire the mutex. We only try to acquire if (lock->count >= 0). However, > > what we actually want here is to try to acquire if the mutex is unlocked > > (lock->count == 1). > > > > This patch changes it so that we only try-acquire the mutex upon entering > > the slowpath if it is unlocked, rather than if the lock count is non-negative. > > This helps further reduce unnecessary atomic xchg() operations. > > > > Furthermore, this patch uses !mutex_is_locked(lock) to do the initial > > checks for if the lock is free rather than directly calling atomic_read() > > on the lock->count, in order to improve readability. > > I think this patch can be merged in 2/4, like you had in v1. Otherwise > looks good. Ah, I was thinking that removing the macro would be considered a separate change whereas this 3/4 patch was more of an "optimization". But yes, those 2 patches could also have been kept as 1 patch as well. Thanks for the reviews David and Waiman. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/