Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751366AbaFMMpr (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2014 08:45:47 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:43356 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751292AbaFMMpq (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2014 08:45:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 08:45:34 -0400 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: Boris Ostrovsky , David Vrabel , x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] xenpv: don't BUG when failing to setup NMI callback Message-ID: <20140613124534.GA21873@laptop.dumpdata.com> References: <1402658788-24477-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1402658788-24477-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 01:26:28PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > some old Xen hypervisors (prior to 3.2) forbid DomUs to register > NMI callbacks. E.g. we have the following code in xen-3.1: > > if ( (d->domain_id != 0) || (v->vcpu_id != 0) ) > return -EINVAL; > > Commit 6efa20e49b9cb1db1ab66870cc37323474a75a13 introduced kernel > crash in case PV guest fails to register NMI callback. All x86_64 > PV guests will fail to boot on top of such hypervisors (RHEL5 > example): > > (XEN) traps.c:405:d7 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap [#6] in domain 7 on VCPU 0 [ec=0000] > (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S > (XEN) Domain 7 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3: > (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.1.2-389.el5 x86_64 debug=n Not tainted ]---- > (XEN) CPU: 3 > (XEN) RIP: e033:[] > (XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000000282 CONTEXT: guest > (XEN) rax: ffffffffffffffea rbx: 0000000000000000 rcx: 0000000000000002 > (XEN) rdx: 0000000000000001 rsi: ffffffff81b0fe28 rdi: 0000000000000000 > (XEN) rbp: ffffffff81b0fe40 rsp: ffffffff81b0fde8 r8: 0000000000000000 > (XEN) r9: ffffffff81b0fdd0 r10: 0000000000007ff0 r11: 00000000ffffffff > (XEN) r12: ffffffff81d65900 r13: 0000000000000000 r14: 0000000000000000 > (XEN) r15: 0000000000000000 cr0: 0000000080050033 cr4: 00000000000026b0 > (XEN) cr3: 000000013a263000 cr2: 0000000000000000 > (XEN) ds: 0000 es: 0000 fs: 0000 gs: 0000 ss: e02b cs: e033 > ... > > However it is possible to proceed without NMI callback registered. > Change BUG() with warning in case of -EINVAL. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Oh, we had a similar patch - somebody reported it earlier - and we just checked the version of Xen: http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-05/msg01474.html But I can't remember why I didn't post it. However I do like your path of checking the 'ret'. Vitaly, could expand your patch to also do a check in cvt_gate_to_trap so that it won't enable the NMI handler and then lets pick your patch? > --- > arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 11 ++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c > index 821a11a..5b8b180 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c > @@ -593,8 +593,17 @@ void xen_enable_syscall(void) > void xen_enable_nmi(void) > { > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > - if (register_callback(CALLBACKTYPE_nmi, (char *)nmi)) > + int ret; > + > + ret = register_callback(CALLBACKTYPE_nmi, (char *)nmi); > + if (ret == -EINVAL) { > + /* Hypervisor probably forbids us to register NMI callback, > + that is expected when running on top of Xen-3.1 and older */ > + pr_warn("xen: failed to register NMI callback\n"); > + } else if (ret != 0) { > + /* Other hypervisor failure */ > BUG(); > + } > #endif > } > void __init xen_pvmmu_arch_setup(void) > -- > 1.9.3 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/