Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:43:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:43:05 -0500 Received: from windsormachine.com ([206.48.122.28]:31757 "EHLO router.windsormachine.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:43:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:50:01 -0500 (EST) From: Mike Dresser To: Jeff Garzik cc: list linux-kernel Subject: Re: RTL8139D support for 2.4? In-Reply-To: <3DD96C98.7020508@pobox.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1040 Lines: 32 On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Mike Dresser wrote: > > > I'll try another card, and get back to you, just in case it's a > > partially fubar card. > > FWIW I have seen tons of 8139s that work fine but have invalid PCI > IDs... the price of being a US$0.50 chip I guess :) > > So I doubt it's a fubar card... Just tried another 8139D card, same make, and it shows up as a 10ec:8139 instead of the 00ec. Bad bit, indeed. So I've got a card that has a wrong PCI id, I wonder what Windows would do if i installed it there. I wonder if I have more of these to test. Found another one. I'll test THIS one too :) > 8139C+ is, in CVS lingo, a branch. 8139D has -none- of the 8139C+ > functions... Thanks :) How about a note in the C+ things that D isn't higher than C+ then. Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/