Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752771AbaFOGya (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2014 02:54:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:36101 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751163AbaFOGy3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2014 02:54:29 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 08:54:23 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Vince Weaver Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Vineet Gupta , Steven Miao , James Hogan , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Cody P Schafer , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Hendrik Brueckner , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] perf: Use common PMU interrupt disabled code on all architectures Message-ID: <20140615065423.GA20028@gmail.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Vince Weaver wrote: > > Now that "perf/x86: Use common PMU interrupt disabled code" > (c184c980de30dc) was merged, I went and audited all of the > architectures. The following patchset attempts to move > all of the ones that have code disabling sampled events > due to lack of overflow interrupt to the new common code. > > ARM and x86 were already updated with the original changeset. > > Note that this is an ABI change in some cases, as many > architectures returned EINVAL previously rather than > EOPNOTSUPP. > > Unfortunately these patches are not tested at all, as I don't have > access to the hardware. Looks good to me, for v3.17. Peter, what do you think? Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/