Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753878AbaFQAo3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:44:29 -0400 Received: from 99-65-72-227.uvs.sntcca.sbcglobal.net ([99.65.72.227]:57668 "EHLO stargate3.asicdesigners.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752934AbaFQAo0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:44:26 -0400 Message-ID: <539F8F62.4000805@chelsio.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:44:18 -0700 From: Anish Bhatt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Warn on unnecessary void function return statements References: <1401728316.5770.9.camel@joe-AO725> <1402961300-17985-1-git-send-email-anish@chelsio.com> <1402964898.11561.2.camel@joe-AO725> In-Reply-To: <1402964898.11561.2.camel@joe-AO725> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org My code has multiple exit lables: void function(void) { ... if (err1) goto exit1; ... if (err2) goto exit2; ... return; /* Good return, no errors */ exit1: printk(err1); return; exit2: printk(err2); } The single tabbed return was required to prevent the good return & err1 messages cascading down. The extra exit label with a noop looks weird, but is passing checkpatch.pl --strict, so I will go with that, thanks. -Anish -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/