Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753914AbaFQBEf (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:04:35 -0400 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com ([60.250.210.242]:55404 "EHLO rtits2.realtek.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751592AbaFQBEe (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:04:34 -0400 X-SpamFilter-By: BOX Solutions SpamTrap 5.39 with qID s5H140UP008394, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Message-ID: <539F9521.50706@realsil.com.cn> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:08:49 +0800 From: micky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: rtsx: add dma transfer function References: <9021eae37d96aa027d00ae4a7b6cd84dbbd1b6b5.1402037564.git.micky_ching@realsil.com.cn> <20140616122032.GS14323@lee--X1> In-Reply-To: <20140616122032.GS14323@lee--X1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [172.29.41.103] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/16/2014 08:20 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > I don't see any glaring issues with this patch. Does it rely on the > first patch, or vise versa, or can it just be applied? Hi Jones, [PATCH 2/2] need function defined in [PATCH 1/2]， so we provide interface in [mfd] and called in [mmc]. Best Regards. micky. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/