Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 01:25:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 01:25:42 -0500 Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org ([156.26.20.181]:61704 "EHLO wire.cadcamlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 01:25:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 00:25:10 -0600 To: Wakko Warner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: OK to mount multiple FS in one dir? Message-ID: <20010207002510.A10556@cadcamlab.org> In-Reply-To: <3A7E1942.5090903@goingware.com> <20010205180646.B32155@cadcamlab.org> <033601c09075$a60e43e0$de00a8c0@homeip.net> <20010206154616.A9875@animx.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: <20010206154616.A9875@animx.eu.org>; from wakko@animx.eu.org on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 03:46:16PM -0500 From: Peter Samuelson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Wakko Warner] > I have a question, why was this idea even considered? Al Viro likes Plan9 process-local namespaces. He seems to be trying to move Linux in that direction. In the past year he has been hacking the semantics of filesystems and mounting, probably with namespaces as an eventual goal, and this is one of the things that has fallen out of the implementation. A more useful thing to fall out of the same hacking is loopback mounting -- i.e. the same filesystem mounted multiple places. In Linux-land I guess we call it 'mount --bind'. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/