Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933503AbaFQPm7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:42:59 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:57763 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932989AbaFQPm5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:42:57 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mark.brown@linaro.org Cc: Tomasz Figa , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , Russell King - ARM Linux , Samuel Ortiz , Pankaj Dubey , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joshi@samsung.com, vikas.sajjan@samsung.com, chow.kim@samsung.com, Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from syscon devices Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:42:14 +0200 Message-ID: <5027740.B7iVUcUX2T@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.11.0-18-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1403019164-12514-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> References: <53A05E2D.6020702@samsung.com> <1403019164-12514-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:ljmAai3pFpr/9shGRH0ABz96zjyRX9L2WhF6J+AwQjd gLc/thJfxI5GgeANECioTWf72wjMFG3mKzCTYOwj/xWMKGxIbk QbW3g4fA1ujAK+4REaTrhI+KlMAeT+fQrDRKESOvo4WJkmWPox 8W8VzBKLR+Fq6nxj/i2T5DEygzw+YObBwZrRVvORoUpfBN/Xbl biQlDDznBS2NNL6K8MUnmlsUvOog9bZwTrOXh5m6+CH/KSaxVi QKYWL/vkKzwuwEW1v+0Ycg+D6t6RhEffnGrZtw8U7zZfWpvj2S ngTvx0IO+5KOrbjqhfTDp8zUNgVpW4bDd4P6B+porNb3GSYhTs SvYCrjdBbvgTVWdBv1WA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 17 June 2014 17:32:44 Tomasz Figa wrote: > Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a > platform device that binds to a dedicated driver. However in certain use > cases it is desirable to make a device used with another driver a syscon > interface provider. For example, certain SoCs (e.g. Exynos) contain > system controller blocks which perform various functions such as power > domain control, CPU power management, low power mode control, but in > addition contain certain IP integration glue, such as various signal > masks, coprocessor power control, etc. In such case, there is a need to > have a dedicated driver for such system controller but also share > registers with other drivers. The latter is where the syscon interface > is helpful. > > This patch decouples syscon object from syscon driver, so that it can be > registered from any driver in addition to the original "syscon" platform > driver. > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa Hi Tomasz, This seems like a reasonable way of solving the problem, but I think there is an even better one that we have about in the past: if we promote syscon from a platform driver into a a drivers/base/ helper that is independent of the platform device matching, we can use call syscon_regmap_lookup_* for any device node, whether it's already bound to a driver or not, which do what you need. It would also make it easier to call the syscon code before the platform_device infrastructure gets initialized, which is something a number of people have asked for, e.g. for using regmap to do SMP bringup or for clock registration. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/