Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933945AbaFQRNV (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:13:21 -0400 Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:63852 "EHLO mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933325AbaFQRNT (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:13:19 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7f626d000004b39-ed-53a0772cefe7 Message-id: <53A07719.7050206@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:12:57 +0200 From: Tomasz Figa Organization: Samsung R&D Institute Poland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Pankaj Dubey , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, chow.kim@samsung.com, vikas.sajjan@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] ARM: EXYNOS: Add platform driver support for Exynos PMU. References: <1399704998-13321-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <1399704998-13321-11-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> In-reply-to: <1399704998-13321-11-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7o65QuCDfYdZbNYNukum0Xvgqts FpseX2O1uLxrDpvFjPP7mCxuX+a1WLT1C7vFzWfbmRw4PFqae9g8Ni+p9+jbsorR4/MmuQCW KC6blNSczLLUIn27BK6MyesfsRfcSa+YdqmZpYHxf3AXIweHhICJxKYFNl2MnECmmMSFe+vZ QGwhgaWMEgcu5XcxcgHZnxklZp1qBUvwCmhJvD+8gRnEZhFQlXjx5yAriM0moCbxueERWA0/ UM2apussIPNFBSIkHl8QgmgVlPgx+R4LyEwRgSmMEhd7ljGCJJgFkiU+nfsBNlMYqP7o2vnM EIs7GCW65swCK+IU8JL4c+E2G0SDjsT+1mlQtrzE5jVvmScwCs5CsmQWkrJZSMoWMDKvYhRN LU0uKE5KzzXSK07MLS7NS9dLzs/dxAgJ/K87GJceszrEKMDBqMTDq/BvTrAQa2JZcWXuIUYJ DmYlEd5zWQuChXhTEiurUovy44tKc1KLDzEycXBKNTAy/X68y2vZ17zzbJ6aG6XX5Jhe/rtw vXnB2QDbY6+UcrN5ZW8FVxUf0Kj3tA0JPPb70uP50Q7/vueHhgq8rkiMt+JPr5CduPTV+ukf 8jvXnbfSK+vvPDO/nq9NlSGIKXZDxN7nEwy3+O6wbpV5Y6Zfxc/CzxYes/zN6aL+7FW2Wr41 xRusepVYijMSDbWYi4oTAXdc7p9aAgAA Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Pankaj, [dropping Young-Gun Jang , as my mailer denies to send to this address] Please see my comments inline. I have skipped comments for changed related to regmap, as according to our previous discussion they will be dropped in next version. On 10.05.2014 08:56, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > This patch modifies Exynos Power Management Unit (PMU) initialization > implementation in following way: > > - Added platform_device support by registering static platform device. > - Added platform struct exynos_pmu_data to hold platform specific data. > - For each SoC's PMU support now we can add platform data and statically > bind PMU configuration and SoC specific initialization function. > - Probe function will scan DT and based on matching PMU compatibility > string initialize pmu_context which will be platform_data for driver. > - Obtain PMU regmap handle using "syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle" so > that we can reduce dependency over machine header files. > - Separate each SoC's PMU initialization function and make it as part of > platform data. > - It also removes uses of soc_is_exynosXYZ() thus making PMU implementation > independent of "plat/cpu.h". > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey > Signed-off-by: Young-Gun Jang > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c | 266 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 210 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c > index 67116a5..6a7fa8e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > /* > - * Copyright (c) 2011-2012 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > + * Copyright (c) 2011-2014 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > * http://www.samsung.com/ > * > * EXYNOS - CPU PMU(Power Management Unit) support > @@ -9,20 +9,33 @@ > * published by the Free Software Foundation. > */ > > -#include > -#include > +#include > #include > - > -#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > > #include "common.h" > #include "regs-pmu.h" > > -static const struct exynos_pmu_conf *exynos_pmu_config; > -static struct regmap *pmu_regmap; > +struct exynos_pmu_data { > + const struct exynos_pmu_conf *pmu_config; > + const struct exynos_pmu_conf *pmu_config_extra; > + void (*pmu_init)(void); > + void (*powerdown_conf)(enum sys_powerdown); > +}; > + > +struct exynos_pmu_context { > + struct device *dev; > + struct exynos_pmu_data *pmu_data; > + struct regmap *pmu_regmap; > +}; > + > +static struct exynos_pmu_context *pmu_context; > > static const struct exynos_pmu_conf exynos4210_pmu_config[] = { > - /* { .reg = address, .val = { AFTR, LPA, SLEEP } */ > + /* { .offset = address, .val = { AFTR, LPA, SLEEP } */ AFAICT those have changed already in patch 08/11. > { S5P_ARM_CORE0_LOWPWR, { 0x0, 0x0, 0x2 } }, > { S5P_DIS_IRQ_CORE0, { 0x0, 0x0, 0x0 } }, > { S5P_DIS_IRQ_CENTRAL0, { 0x0, 0x0, 0x0 } }, > @@ -216,7 +229,7 @@ static const struct exynos_pmu_conf exynos4412_pmu_config[] = { > }; > > static const struct exynos_pmu_conf exynos5250_pmu_config[] = { > - /* { .reg = address, .val = { AFTR, LPA, SLEEP } */ > + /* { .offset = address, .val = { AFTR, LPA, SLEEP } */ Ditto. > { EXYNOS5_ARM_CORE0_SYS_PWR_REG, { 0x0, 0x0, 0x2} }, > { EXYNOS5_DIS_IRQ_ARM_CORE0_LOCAL_SYS_PWR_REG, { 0x0, 0x0, 0x0} }, > { EXYNOS5_DIS_IRQ_ARM_CORE0_CENTRAL_SYS_PWR_REG, { 0x0, 0x0, 0x0} }, > @@ -339,7 +352,7 @@ static unsigned int const exynos5_list_diable_wfi_wfe[] = { > EXYNOS5_ISP_ARM_OPTION, > }; > > -static void exynos5_init_pmu(void) > +void exynos5_powerdown_conf(enum sys_powerdown mode) static > { > unsigned int i; > unsigned int tmp; > @@ -348,81 +361,222 @@ static void exynos5_init_pmu(void) > * Enable both SC_FEEDBACK and SC_COUNTER > */ > for (i = 0 ; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_list_both_cnt_feed) ; i++) { > - regmap_read(pmu_regmap, exynos5_list_both_cnt_feed[i], &tmp); > + regmap_read(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > + exynos5_list_both_cnt_feed[i], &tmp); > tmp |= (EXYNOS5_USE_SC_FEEDBACK | > EXYNOS5_USE_SC_COUNTER); > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, exynos5_list_both_cnt_feed[i], tmp); > + regmap_write(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > + exynos5_list_both_cnt_feed[i], tmp); > } > > /* > * SKIP_DEACTIVATE_ACEACP_IN_PWDN_BITFIELD Enable > */ > - regmap_read(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_ARM_COMMON_OPTION, &tmp); > + regmap_read(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_ARM_COMMON_OPTION, &tmp); > tmp |= EXYNOS5_SKIP_DEACTIVATE_ACEACP_IN_PWDN; > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_ARM_COMMON_OPTION, tmp); > + regmap_write(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_ARM_COMMON_OPTION, tmp); > > /* > * Disable WFI/WFE on XXX_OPTION > */ > for (i = 0 ; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_list_diable_wfi_wfe) ; i++) { > - tmp = regmap_read(pmu_regmap, exynos5_list_diable_wfi_wfe[i], > - &tmp); > + tmp = regmap_read(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > + exynos5_list_diable_wfi_wfe[i], &tmp); > tmp &= ~(EXYNOS5_OPTION_USE_STANDBYWFE | > EXYNOS5_OPTION_USE_STANDBYWFI); > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, exynos5_list_diable_wfi_wfe[i], tmp); > + regmap_write(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > + exynos5_list_diable_wfi_wfe[i], tmp); > } > } > > void exynos_sys_powerdown_conf(enum sys_powerdown mode) > { > unsigned int i; > + struct exynos_pmu_data *pmu_data = pmu_context->pmu_data; > + > + if (pmu_data->powerdown_conf) > + pmu_data->powerdown_conf(mode); > + > + if (pmu_data->pmu_config) { > + for (i = 0; (pmu_data->pmu_config[i].offset != PMU_TABLE_END) ; i++) > + regmap_write(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > + pmu_data->pmu_config[i].offset, > + pmu_data->pmu_config[i].val[mode]); > + } > + > + if (pmu_data->pmu_config_extra) { > + for (i = 0; pmu_data->pmu_config_extra[i].offset != PMU_TABLE_END; i++) > + regmap_write(pmu_context->pmu_regmap, > + pmu_data->pmu_config_extra[i].offset, > + pmu_data->pmu_config_extra[i].val[mode]); > + } > +} > + > +static void exynos5250_pmu_init(void) > +{ > + unsigned int tmp; > + struct regmap *pmu_regmap = pmu_context->pmu_regmap; > + /* > + * When SYS_WDTRESET is set, watchdog timer reset request > + * is ignored by power management unit. > + */ > + regmap_read(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_AUTO_WDTRESET_DISABLE, &tmp); > + tmp &= ~EXYNOS5_SYS_WDTRESET; > + regmap_write(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_AUTO_WDTRESET_DISABLE, tmp); > + > + regmap_read(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_MASK_WDTRESET_REQUEST, &tmp); > + tmp &= ~EXYNOS5_SYS_WDTRESET; > + regmap_write(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_MASK_WDTRESET_REQUEST, tmp); > +} > + > +static struct exynos_pmu_data exynos4210_pmu_data = { > + .pmu_config = exynos4210_pmu_config, > +}; > + > +static struct exynos_pmu_data exynos4x12_pmu_data = { Should be probably called exynos4212_pmu_data. > + .pmu_config = exynos4x12_pmu_config, > +}; > + > +static struct exynos_pmu_data exynos4412_pmu_data = { > + .pmu_config = exynos4x12_pmu_config, > + .pmu_config_extra = exynos4412_pmu_config, > +}; > + > +static struct exynos_pmu_data exynos5250_pmu_data = { > + .pmu_config = exynos5250_pmu_config, > + .pmu_init = exynos5250_pmu_init, > + .powerdown_conf = exynos5_powerdown_conf, > +}; > + > +/* > + * PMU platform driver and devicetree bindings. > + */ > +static struct of_device_id exynos_pmu_of_device_ids[] = { > + { > + .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu", > + .data = (void *)&exynos4210_pmu_data, > + }, > + { > + .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-pmu", > + .data = (void *)&exynos4x12_pmu_data, > + }, > + { > + .compatible = "samsung,exynos4412-pmu", > + .data = (void *)&exynos4412_pmu_data, > + }, > + { > + .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", > + .data = (void *)&exynos5250_pmu_data, > + }, > + {}, > +}; > + > +static int exynos_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device_node *np; > + const struct of_device_id *match; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > - if (soc_is_exynos5250()) > - exynos5_init_pmu(); > + pmu_context = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, > + sizeof(struct exynos_pmu_context), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (pmu_context == NULL) { > + dev_err(dev, "Cannot allocate memory.\n"); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + > + np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, > + exynos_pmu_of_device_ids, &match); > + if (!np) { > + pr_warn("%s, failed to find PMU node\n", __func__); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > > - for (i = 0; (exynos_pmu_config[i].offset != PMU_TABLE_END) ; i++) > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, exynos_pmu_config[i].offset, > - exynos_pmu_config[i].val[mode]); > + pmu_context->pmu_data = (struct exynos_pmu_data *) match->data; > + pmu_context->pmu_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, NULL); > > - if (soc_is_exynos4412()) { > - for (i = 0; exynos4412_pmu_config[i].offset != PMU_TABLE_END; i++) > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, exynos4412_pmu_config[i].offset, > - exynos4412_pmu_config[i].val[mode]); > + if (IS_ERR(pmu_context->pmu_regmap)) { > + pr_err("failed to find exynos_pmu_regmap\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(pmu_context->pmu_regmap); > } > + > + if (pmu_context->pmu_data->pmu_init) > + pmu_context->pmu_data->pmu_init(); > + > + pmu_context->dev = dev; > + > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmu_context); > + > + pr_info("Exynos PMU Driver probe done!!!\n"); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int exynos_pmu_suspend(struct device *dev) > +{ > + /* ToDo: */ > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int exynos_pmu_resume(struct device *dev) > +{ > + /* ToDo: */ > + return 0; > } No need to add those if unused. > > -static int __init exynos_pmu_init(void) > +static const struct dev_pm_ops exynos_pmu_pm = { > + .suspend = exynos_pmu_suspend, > + .resume = exynos_pmu_resume, > +}; You can drop this structure too. > + > +static int exynos_pmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + /* nothing to do here */ > + return 0; > +} This function as well. > + > +static struct platform_device *exynos_pmu_pdev; > + > +static struct platform_driver exynos_pmu_driver = { > + .driver = { > + .name = "exynos-pmu", > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > + .pm = &exynos_pmu_pm, > + }, > + .probe = exynos_pmu_probe, > + .remove = exynos_pmu_remove, > +}; > + > +static int __init exynos_pmu_of_init(void) > { > - unsigned int value; > - > - exynos_pmu_config = exynos4210_pmu_config; > - pmu_regmap = get_exynos_pmuregmap(); > - > - if (soc_is_exynos4210()) { > - exynos_pmu_config = exynos4210_pmu_config; > - pr_info("EXYNOS4210 PMU Initialize\n"); > - } else if (soc_is_exynos4212() || soc_is_exynos4412()) { > - exynos_pmu_config = exynos4x12_pmu_config; > - pr_info("EXYNOS4x12 PMU Initialize\n"); > - } else if (soc_is_exynos5250()) { > - /* > - * When SYS_WDTRESET is set, watchdog timer reset request > - * is ignored by power management unit. > - */ > - regmap_read(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_AUTO_WDTRESET_DISABLE, &value); > - value &= ~EXYNOS5_SYS_WDTRESET; > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_AUTO_WDTRESET_DISABLE, value); > - > - regmap_read(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_MASK_WDTRESET_REQUEST, &value); > - value &= ~EXYNOS5_SYS_WDTRESET; > - regmap_write(pmu_regmap, EXYNOS5_MASK_WDTRESET_REQUEST, value); > - > - exynos_pmu_config = exynos5250_pmu_config; > - pr_info("EXYNOS5250 PMU Initialize\n"); > - } else { > - pr_info("EXYNOS: PMU not supported\n"); > + int ret; > + > + ret = platform_driver_register(&exynos_pmu_driver); > + if (ret < 0) > + goto out; > + > + exynos_pmu_pdev = platform_device_register_simple("exynos-pmu", -1, > + NULL, 0); Hmm, I don't see the point of making this a platform driver only to register respective platform device few lines below. If you take into account the patch for syscon I posted as a reply to patch 06/11, you will be able to make this a normal platform driver that binds to DT node directly and then register a syscon in probe function above. > + > + if (IS_ERR(exynos_pmu_pdev)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(exynos_pmu_pdev); > + goto out1; > } > > return 0; > +out1: > + platform_driver_unregister(&exynos_pmu_driver); > +out: > + return ret; > } > -arch_initcall(exynos_pmu_init); > +arch_initcall(exynos_pmu_of_init); Is there a need to change the name? > + > +static void __exit exynos_pmu_exit(void) > +{ > + platform_device_unregister(exynos_pmu_pdev); > + platform_driver_unregister(&exynos_pmu_driver); > +} > +module_exit(exynos_pmu_exit); No need for module_exit() in case of such low level code. It will be always built-in. > + > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Pankaj Dubey +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("EXYNOS Power Management Unit Driver"); > This driver will never be a module, so I don't think there is any need for those. -- Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/