Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:25:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:25:29 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:52457 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:25:27 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 18:30:54 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Ducrot Bruno Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.20 ACPI Message-ID: <20021119183054.GA6771@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Ducrot Bruno , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4.3.2.7.2.20021119134830.00b53680@mail.dns-host.com> <20021119130728.GA28759@suse.de> <20021119142731.GF27595@poup.poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021119142731.GF27595@poup.poupinou.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 933 Lines: 25 On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 03:27:31PM +0100, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > > The newer ACPI code also introduces problems that aren't > > present with the current 2.4.20rc code. Got it. This actually isn't a problem with new ACPI code, but the addition of the new stack overflow check. It falls flat on its face really early if that is enabled. The box is totally dead before console is initialised, so I don't have backtraces, I'll give that a shot with a serial console later. In the meantime, acpi folks should probably try testing with CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW=y to see if they hit the same problems I'm getting. Back later.. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/