Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:42:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:41:45 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:41732 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:41:10 -0500 Message-ID: <3DDA8746.3010409@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:47:34 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021018 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Mansfield CC: Douglas Gilbert , Andre Hedrick , "J. E. J. Bottomley" , Linus Torvalds , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-2.4.18-modified-scsi-h.patch References: <3DDA0E63.9050307@torque.net> <20021119104004.A21438@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 701 Lines: 23 Patrick Mansfield wrote: > I don't see why we need the #define, or is that another patch? The define exists for the same reason that HAVE_xxx exists in include/linux/netdevice.h and other headers: a feature test macro, so code using this pointer can detect its presence or absence. The world of drivers is not all in the kernel tarball, ya know ;-) But as I said, the macro is misnamed, it should be HAVE_UPPER_PRIVATE_DATA or similar. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/