Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:46:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:44:51 -0500 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:29188 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:43:59 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:50:41 -0800 (PST) From: Andre Hedrick To: Jeff Garzik cc: Patrick Mansfield , Douglas Gilbert , "J. E. J. Bottomley" , Linus Torvalds , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-2.4.18-modified-scsi-h.patch In-Reply-To: <3DDA8746.3010409@pobox.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 996 Lines: 34 On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Patrick Mansfield wrote: > > > I don't see why we need the #define, or is that another patch? > > > > The define exists for the same reason that HAVE_xxx exists in > include/linux/netdevice.h and other headers: a feature test macro, so > code using this pointer can detect its presence or absence. The world > of drivers is not all in the kernel tarball, ya know ;-) > > But as I said, the macro is misnamed, it should be > HAVE_UPPER_PRIVATE_DATA or similar. > > Jeff Hey Jeff! Works for me, has each HBA has the need to reserve local structs and not pollute the basic kernel w/ bloat! Cheers, Andre Hedrick, CTO & Founder iSCSI Software Solutions Provider http://www.PyXTechnologies.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/