Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965659AbaFRJuT (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 05:50:19 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:55809 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965007AbaFRJuQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 05:50:16 -0400 Message-ID: <53A160D0.6010306@collabora.co.uk> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 11:50:08 +0200 From: Javier Martinez Canillas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones CC: Mark Brown , Samuel Ortiz , Mike Turquette , Liam Girdwood , Alessandro Zummo , Kukjin Kim , Doug Anderson , Olof Johansson , Sjoerd Simons , Daniel Stone , Tomeu Vizoso , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] mfd: Add driver for Maxim 77802 Power Management IC References: <1402941758-11216-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1402941758-11216-7-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <20140616192720.GK5099@sirena.org.uk> <53A01F09.5070106@collabora.co.uk> <20140618083204.GP21030@lee--X1> In-Reply-To: <20140618083204.GP21030@lee--X1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Lee, On 06/18/2014 10:32 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> +config MFD_MAX77802 >> >> + tristate "Maxim Integrated MAX77802 PMIC Support" >> >> + depends on I2C=y >> >> + select MFD_CORE >> >> + select REGMAP_I2C >> >> + select REGMAP_IRQ >> >> + select IRQ_DOMAIN >> >> + help >> >> + Say yes here to support for Maxim Integrated MAX77802. >> >> + This is a Power Management IC with RTC on chip. >> >> + This driver provides common support for accessing the device; >> >> + additional drivers must be enabled in order to use the functionality >> >> + of the device. >> >> + >> > >> > It is a bit unorthodox to put the build infrastructure in the same patch >> > as the DT binding... >> > >> >> I thought it was the opposite. That a DT binding document has to be added along >> with the first user of the binding but I'll separate the DT doc in another patch >> then if that is the right thing to do. > > This was the 'old' method, but changed a little over a year ago. > >> Thanks a lot for all your suggestions, I'll wait a little to see if there is >> more feedback and repost a v3 addressing all the issues you pointed out. > > Just re-post it. I'll review the next version. > Ok, will do. I was waiting for Krzysztof's feedback but he can review v3 as well. Thanks a lot and best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/