Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:44:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:44:13 -0500 Received: from chaos.physics.uiowa.edu ([128.255.34.189]:34977 "EHLO chaos.physics.uiowa.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:43:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:50:13 -0600 (CST) From: Kai Germaschewski X-X-Sender: kai@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu To: "Richard B. Johnson" cc: Sam Ravnborg , , Subject: Re: [RFC/CFT] Separate obj/src dir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1044 Lines: 23 On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > I think all you did was increase the compile time by writing > output files to different directories than the ones currently > in cache. There are a lot of negatives. It would be a shame for > you to waste a great deal of time on something that would not > be accepted into the distribution. Remember the earlier `make modules` > where the new objects went into a separate directory with sym-links? > That got changed. I think it got changed for good reasons. Well, this isn't necessarily for everybody, if it's of no use for you, that's okay. Note that the patch doesn't (unless it has bugs ;) change the normal behavior at all. It really only adds a script to set up a separate objdir. If you don't want that, don't use that script ;) --Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/