Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754101AbaFRRq4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:46:56 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:34329 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752656AbaFRRqy (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:46:54 -0400 Message-ID: <53A1D089.8010605@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 11:46:49 -0600 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomeu Vizoso , Thierry Reding , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , David Airlie , Mike Turquette , myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] memory: tegra124-emc: Add EMC driver References: <1402925713-25426-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <1402925713-25426-2-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <539F4D44.3070309@wwwdotorg.org> <53A03186.3040703@collabora.com> <53A069B6.6070902@wwwdotorg.org> <53A1CB23.5090307@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: <53A1CB23.5090307@collabora.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/18/2014 11:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On 06/17/2014 06:15 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 06/17/2014 06:16 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> On 06/16/2014 10:02 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> On 06/16/2014 07:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA124_EMC >>>>> +int tegra124_emc_reserve_bandwidth(unsigned int consumer, unsigned >>>>> long rate); >>>>> +void tegra124_emc_set_floor(unsigned long freq); >>>>> +void tegra124_emc_set_ceiling(unsigned long freq); >>>>> +#else >>>>> +int tegra124_emc_reserve_bandwidth(unsigned int consumer, unsigned >>>>> long rate) >>>>> +{ return -ENODEV; } >>>>> +void tegra124_emc_set_floor(unsigned long freq) >>>>> +{ return; } >>>>> +void tegra124_emc_set_ceiling(unsigned long freq) >>>>> +{ return; } >>>>> +#endif >>>> >>>> I'll repeat what I said off-list so that we can have the whole >>>> conversation on the list: >>>> >>>> That looks like a custom Tegra-specific API. I think it'd be much >>>> better >>>> to integrate this into the common clock framework as a standard clock >>>> constraints API. There are other use-cases for clock constraints >>>> besides >>>> EMC scaling (e.g. some in audio on Tegra, and I'm sure many on other >>>> SoCs too). >>> >>> Yes, I wrote a bit in the cover letter about our requirements and how >>> they map to the CCF. Could you please comment on that? >> >> My comments remain the same. I believe this is something that belongs in >> the clock driver, or at the least, some API that takes a struct clock as >> its parameter, so that drivers can use the existing DT clock lookup >> mechanism. > > Ok, let me put this strawman here to see if I have gotten close to what > you have in mind: > > * add per-client accounting (Rabin's patches referenced before) > > * add clk_set_floor, to be used by cpufreq, load stats, etc. > > * add clk_set_ceiling, to be used by battery drivers, thermal, etc. Yes. I'd expect those to be maintained per-client, and so the clock core (or whatever higher level code implements clk_set_floor/ceiling) performs the logic that "blends" together all the different requests from different clients. As an aside, for audio usage, I would expect clk_set_rate to be a per-client (rather than per HW clock) operation too, and to error out if one client says it wants to set pll_a to the rate needed for 44.1KHz-based audio and a different client wants the rate for 48KHz-based audio. > * an EMC driver would collect bandwidth and latency requests from > consumers and call clk_set_floor on the EMC clock. > > * the EMC driver would also register for rate change notifications in > the EMC clock and would update the latency allowance registers at that > point. > > How does it sound? At a high level, yes this sounds about right to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/